00:25:07 03hellmonk02 07* 0.35-a0-894-g1abff85513: Further basedam adjustments 10(4 minutes ago, 3 files, 6+ 6-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/1abff85513ba 03:33:18 Experimental (bcrawl) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23-a0-5261-gd9800d219b 08:30:31 <08o​____0> eh, made it work 09:18:40 New branch created: pull/5394 (3 commits) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5394 09:18:41 03RypoFalem02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5394 * 0.35-a0-885-ge720839693: feat: Make most config text patterns case insensitive 10(12 hours ago, 3 files, 28+ 20-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/e7208396932a 09:18:41 03RypoFalem02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5394 * 0.35-a0-886-g8edc6f79a8: fix: unusual_monster_items now correctly remove/clear vulnerable brands 10(51 minutes ago, 3 files, 20+ 12-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/8edc6f79a817 09:18:41 03RypoFalem02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5394 * 0.35-a0-887-gf730129428: docs: document unusual_monster_items vulnerable:brand:xl syntax 10(26 minutes ago, 1 file, 9+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/f730129428b7 09:33:30 Hello o/ Is this channel in use? I had a small flavor thing that I was thinking of contributing, although looking at the number of open PRs on Github I'm not sure if contributions are outpacing the review workload 09:38:05 Yup; it's in use. (Will let a maintainer answer that question though) 09:38:55 I think most of those are PRs that people have looked at and haven't decided if they want to do them or not 09:39:21 or old bugs that might not exist any more but nobody's had the time to weed them 09:41:24 (or haven't been responded to by the submitter; there's a fair number of drive-by PRs) 09:46:09 Thank you! For my idea, I was thinking about how sometimes Xom trolls the player by banishing them to the abyss, then sending them right back to where they were. I had an idea for a similar troll, where Xom has a rare chance to gift the player an exact copy of an unrand that they're already wielding 09:47:02 <11O​dds> (Yeah, things that are clear improvements and also easily reviewed code get in pretty promptly - what we aren't amazing at is doing anythign about things that don't fall into those categories) 10:10:08 03RypoFalem02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5394 * 0.35-a0-888-g24ab394097: update a comment (can be squashed into 8edc6f7) 10(2 minutes ago, 1 file, 2+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/24ab394097bc 10:50:55 03regret-index02 07* 0.35-a0-895-geb6f693df5: Tag a wall mimic vault as no_tele_into (mat4rat4s) 10(55 seconds ago, 1 file, 2+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/eb6f693df5bb 13:13:45 <08o​____0> https://discord.com/channels/205277826788622337/205316046230388737/1542948118612414515 Menu code heh. In the read menu you can change tabs to quaff items instead but trying to do this won't actually work "you can't read that!" https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/eb6f693df5bb550d8c74b3fe591c64008db43a04/crawl-ref/source/item-use.cc#L1018 use_item_menu is called here with the read operation. The operation is changed to quaff when you 13:13:46 switch tabs but only inside the UseItemMenu. When it comes time to actually quaff the potion the in-scope oper variable is still read. I'm not sure how to fix it (can open a github issue if preferred) 15:45:26 Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.35-a0-895-geb6f693df5 (34) 17:04:03 New branch created: pull/5396 (4 commits) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5396 17:04:05 03desiderautumn02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5396 * 0.35-a0-895-g615554d732: Fix typo in xom_event_data documentation 10(5 minutes ago, 1 file, 6+ 6-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/615554d73265 17:04:05 03desiderautumn02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5396 * 0.35-a0-896-g32a42309b6: Fix unreachable Xom flavor text 10(5 minutes ago, 1 file, 4+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/32a42309b6ee 17:04:05 03desiderautumn02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5396 * 0.35-a0-897-gacc6f44ef2: Remove unnecessary god_acting call 10(5 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/acc6f44ef240 17:04:05 03desiderautumn02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/5396 * 0.35-a0-898-g687923f228: Increase chance of Xom orb flavor text 10(5 minutes ago, 1 file, 1+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/687923f22851 17:06:14 While looking through xom.cc I noticed some minor cleanup opportunities, ultimately it's only 10 lines of code but I split it up into 4 commits regardless, please let me know if squashing is preferred. 17:07:01 Also please let me know if I'm wrong about anything, I'm unfamiliar with the codebase so this is my attempt to familiarize myself before trying anything larger. 18:10:04 <06d​olorous_84348> I'm not the main developer, but regarding squashing, I'd say splitting up documentation changes and actual code changes is good. 18:13:02 <06d​olorous_84348> Looking at #4902 again. IIRC, the last time I brought it up, the commentary was that it was a good idea but the numbers needed adjustment. Since it's been awhile, I could take a stab at adjusting the numbers, or does anyone have any suggestions regarding the numbers? 19:04:26 <08o​____0> !issue 4907 19:04:28 <04C​erebot> https://github.com/crawl/crawl/issues/4907 19:04:52 <06d​olorous_84348> Forgot that was a thing; thanks. 19:49:08 <09h​ellmonk> do you have a link to the previous conversation? I don't know what the numbers actually look like pre versus post change 20:22:29 <08o​____0> ^ 11/23/25 UTC 20:23:43 <08o​____0> with apologies for the date format discord gave to me and I redirected to y'all :P 20:27:47 <08o​____0> https://crawl.akrasiac.org/logs/cheibriados/%23crawl-dev-20251122.lg for irc folk 20:27:49 <09h​ellmonk> Ah ok, seems like not much was decided 20:33:56 <09h​ellmonk> How many artifact demon weapons generate per game? 20:39:20 <09h​ellmonk> My suspicion is that the average demon weapon randart becomes somewhat better with this change, but also that they're rare enough that it doesn't really matter. 21:48:08 <06d​olorous_84348> What I was thinking is to make the weight numbers a bit more like the ones used for artefact ranged, so instead of 2 and 1, it'd be 8s for chaos, draining, reaping, and vampirism, then 4 for antimagic, 3 for distortion, and 2 for pain. As for the justification, if we assume some of these demons would be fighting each other with these, at least thematically, antimagic would cut out the biggest advantage many demons have against 21:48:09 other demons (spells); distortion would be more dangerous to its wielders but would send other demons to the Abyss (where they would either be killed or join Lugonu and escape stronger); and pain would be least common because it would do nothing special to demons but would aid demons with necromancy against their living enemies. 21:51:27 <06d​olorous_84348> Thanks again; it's been one of those days. 22:30:57 Unstable branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.35-a0-895-geb6f693df5 (34) 22:42:21 Windows builds of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.35-a0-895-geb6f693df5 23:19:08 Unstable branch on cbro.berotato.org updated to: 0.35-a0-895-geb6f693df5 (34) 23:45:56 Monster database of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.35-a0-895-geb6f693df5