00:00:31 Looks like Jamon also came up with the same idea 00:00:49 https://discord.com/channels/205277826788622337/205316046230388737/1328361931123327056 00:01:09 And is the one who came up with the more clear "consumable inventory" idea 00:01:55 But yeah 00:02:00 IMO that's the obvious/clean solution 00:02:12 After all, it's already what we do for everything else 00:02:23 spells /books don't take up slots either 00:03:44 But yeah, I do use the whole binding to a set number inscription trick :D 00:04:20 via rcfiles 00:08:14 I also have page up and page down bound to take me up a level and down a level 00:08:17 very handy :D 00:13:08 Unstable branch on cbro.berotato.org updated to: 0.33-a0-854-g9c2e5f8391 (34) 00:55:01 Monster database of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.33-a0-854-g9c2e5f8391 04:32:53 Experimental (bcrawl) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23-a0-5261-gd9800d219b 05:03:04 <02sentei> For separating the normal and consumable inventories, I had a few suggestions before settling on making the 62 slot pr due to most of them not adhering to the inventory principle pf explained https://discord.com/channels/735056636644687913/747522859361894521/1176626772645781576 05:04:18 <02sentei> We also had a 2nd inventory pr based on my 62 slot which similarly tried to add a modifier key to access it, making it take 3 keypresses to use the items similar to what is being suggested for the consumables, which was rejected 05:05:38 Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.33-a0-854-g9c2e5f8 (34) 05:45:20 <06mumra> The separate consumable inventory is pretty similar to something i was thinking about for a while, which was moving just throwing ammo to a different system. You only need it available on 'q'uiver which is its own menu anyway, or when throwing. You don't ever want to drop it, and you just want to pick it all up if you can. Definitely makes sense to me to just move all consumables out like this. Opens up a lot of space for e.g. having new 05:45:21 and rare consumable types as well. 07:08:31 <08nicolae> finally, the opportunity opens for unrand consumables 12:59:44 <09gammafunk> !tells cgettys I will probably get to one or two of your PRs in the next couple days, notably the commit message "lint" one 12:59:55 <09gammafunk> !tell cgettys I will probably get to one or two of your PRs in the next couple days, notably the commit message "lint" one 12:59:56 <04Cerebot> gammafunk: OK, I'll let cgettys know. 13:00:51 <09gammafunk> !tells cgettys The cmake PR/project would be very nice to get over the finish line, but that is an ambitious project that also requires admin coordination 13:00:59 <09gammafunk> wow, twice 13:01:07 <09gammafunk> !tell cgettys The cmake PR/project would be very nice to get over the finish line, but that is an ambitious project that also requires admin coordination 13:01:08 <04Cerebot> gammafunk: OK, I'll let cgettys know. 13:53:57 03Bennett Novak02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/4295 * 0.33-a0-842-gb5ab2706c2: ambiguously gendered skull 10(30 seconds ago, 1 file, 4+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/b5ab2706c2d1 15:28:18 <09hellmonk> ambiguously gendered skull from someone in a grim reaper costume on halloween 16:39:28 Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.33-a0-854-g9c2e5f8391 (34) 18:07:52 <04dracoomega> Hmm... at least I don't read the description as ambiguous, on re-reading it. Zonguldrok is a he, the skull is an it. I wouldn't call my own femur 'she', either, regardless of who it came out of. 18:08:11 <04dracoomega> (I mean, Zonguldrok could not be a he, but 'as currently written') 18:09:09 that was more or less how I read it as well 18:30:38 <09gammafunk> well, the thing is that the skull is intented to represent the necromancer himself 18:30:47 <09gammafunk> it's like the "preserved head in a jar" gag 18:30:53 <09gammafunk> where the head is all that's left 21:08:53 <06mumra> It's not that it was ambiguous, it just sounded awkward switching between he and it --and if it's the skull that's "it" and the necromancer that's "him", I think some of them are the wrong way around. (And there's nowhere else that actually states the gender of Zonguldrok, so is there a need to be specific? As gammafunk pointed out we already have one male skull) 21:23:49 <06mumra> Perhaps the addition of "when held" where it is also made the sentence flow rather differently which highlighted this more. I'm not actually sure if it clarifies the usage much as the author intended; orbs specifically say "carried in place of a shield", whereas "when held" could still mean anything really, especially as it immediately applies to the "it seems disinclined to explain the precise circumstances" part of the sentence, rather 21:23:49 than the "siphoning necromantic power" part ... maybe it's be better to add "when carried in place of a shield" right at the end instead) 21:55:29 @sentei - got a timestamp so I can pull that conversation from cheibriados? I'm not in the Discord half of the channel yet :) 21:55:29 cgettys: You have 2 messages. Use !messages to read them. 21:55:45 !messages 21:55:45 (1/2) gammafunk said (8h 55m 50s ago): I will probably get to one or two of your PRs in the next couple days, notably the commit message "lint" one 21:55:50 Much appreciated :) 21:55:56 !messages 21:55:57 (1/1) gammafunk said (8h 54m 50s ago): The cmake PR/project would be *very* nice to get over the finish line, but that is an ambitious project that also requires admin coordination 21:56:23 Agreed that that one is super ambitious and would require coordination for all of the webserver stuff 21:56:39 Maybe could reduce how much coordination by going "Russian nesting doll" 21:56:55 E.g. leave behind a makefile that invokes cmake so that the rest doesn't have to change 21:57:03 But still would need cmake installed on all the servers