00:31:21 Fork (bcrawl) on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.23-a0-4635-gd11b0deb9c 01:09:48 Stable (0.28) branch on cbro.berotato.org updated to: 0.28.0-45-g0d030f2227 03:24:19 Experimental (bcrawl) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23-a0-4635-gd11b0deb9c 03:25:32 <06a​dvil> seems like there was some miscommunication about when and how that revert would happen? 03:25:42 <06a​dvil> I'm also extremely confused about the save compat intent therer.. 03:25:45 <06a​dvil> *there 03:28:46 <06a​dvil> specifically: why let people upgrade to a broken my that has the zot clock behavior but not the damage shaving behavior?? 03:30:36 <06a​dvil> or I guess, why specifically remove only their damage shaving behavior on upgrade 03:58:35 -!- allbery_b is now known as geekosaur 04:15:00 03OctopodesWeekly02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2508 * 0.29-a0-330-gc7ffad1: Fixes(?) 10(12 minutes ago, 2 files, 10+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/c7ffad1dccc1 04:53:30 03OctopodesWeekly02 {GitHub} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2508 * 0.29-a0-331-g98b8545: Merge pull request #1 from OctopodesWeekly/permatmut 10(7 hours ago, 0 files, 0+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/98b8545c3156 04:53:30 03OctopodesWeekly02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2508 * 0.29-a0-332-gfb49b45: Fix? 10(6 hours ago, 1 file, 4+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/fb49b4501d4b 04:53:30 03OctopodesWeekly02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2508 * 0.29-a0-332-ge4d4ce3: Fix attempt 2 10(6 hours ago, 1 file, 2+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/e4d4ce3014bd 04:53:30 03OctopodesWeekly02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2508 * 0.29-a0-334-g0091acb: Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/OctopodesWeekly/crawl 10(5 hours ago, 0 files, 0+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/0091acb81fef 04:53:30 03OctopodesWeekly02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2508 * 0.29-a0-335-g945e71b: aa 10(5 hours ago, 1 file, 0+ 8-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/945e71bf1ed3 04:53:30 03OctopodesWeekly02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2508 * 0.29-a0-336-g5466b42: Update player.h 10(5 hours ago, 1 file, 2+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/5466b42a85c8 04:53:30 03OctopodesWeekly02 {GitHub} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2508 * 0.29-a0-338-g70364ea: Merge branch 'master' into permatmut 10(10 minutes ago, 0 files, 0+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/70364eaa1caa 05:07:03 Unstable branch on crawl.akrasiac.org updated to: 0.29-a0-320-g9f87420 (34) 05:25:52 -!- mermaid is now known as stella 06:12:00 !lm . 06:12:01 149236. [2022-04-02 01:09:32] Yermak the Sneak (L1 MyBr) began the quest for the Orb on turn 0. (D:1) 07:01:33 03Aliscans02 {kate-} 07* 0.29-a0-321-gf1c4007: FIX Remove an erronous "the" from a message. 10(4 days ago, 1 file, 2+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/f1c400731a4f 07:02:55 Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.29-a0-321-gf1c400731a (34) 07:04:56 <09g​ammafunk> if I'm reading that code correctly, it doesn't remove the damage shaving upon upgrade 07:05:02 <09g​ammafunk> it marks said code with TAG 34 07:05:12 <09g​ammafunk> it does refactor damage shaving into a new function 07:05:32 <09g​ammafunk> oh not a new function or a refactor, I guess 07:06:14 <09g​ammafunk> but from what I can see, damage shaving should still work for them? 07:07:07 <09g​ammafunk> I really like the crawlcode feel of: diff - difficulty: Advanced + difficulty: False 07:18:51 <06a​dvil> Ah possible I misread 07:19:45 <06a​dvil> That was very early in the morning 07:24:39 <10P​leasingFungus> gammafunk is correct (i believe) 07:24:52 <10P​leasingFungus> the oversight was not marking the zot clock mut as also being tag_major_version 34 07:24:56 <10P​leasingFungus> but that's easy to fix 07:25:18 <10P​leasingFungus> also doesn't really matter because we're never going to version 35 😛 07:33:24 <06a​dvil> yeah I was just reading that commit via insomnia 07:35:40 <10P​leasingFungus> sorry 😦 07:57:40 <09g​ammafunk> I'm already at version 35 in my heart 10:25:43 hi all, I got a question about the web game crawl 10:26:06 does it use the same source code as the offline version ? does it use assembly ? or how did you make the game work in the browser ? 10:26:36 and, if you used webassembly, what graphics library did you use ? 10:26:54 <12e​bering> https://crawl.develz.org/wordpress/webtiles-architecture 10:27:06 <12e​bering> we do not use wasm 10:31:40 so the client-side uses javascript to create the graphics ? 10:31:45 by placing sprites 10:31:48 and such 10:34:04 <12e​bering> yep 10:36:33 so that's why the game sometimes gets stuck for a few seconds, as it is waiting for a server response 10:36:51 I thought it was simulating on my device, which made me confused :)) 12:59:11 bad grammar? "The barding of Instinct throb as they attune themselves to your uninjured body." 13:01:02 <10P​leasingFungus> lol 13:01:14 <10P​leasingFungus> yes, that’s using boots grammar 13:01:16 <10P​leasingFungus> good bug 13:01:20 <10P​leasingFungus> worth reporting 13:12:10 https://github.com/crawl/crawl/issues/2514 13:18:38 <10P​leasingFungus> thanks! 13:25:07 <06a​dvil> Nonbinary barding 13:41:26 <10P​leasingFungus> i have never gendered barding and i don't intend to start now 15:24:32 Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.29-a0-321-gf1c400731a (34) 15:29:40 -!- TAS-2012v is now known as TAS_2012v 23:21:41 Unstable branch on cbro.berotato.org updated to: 0.29-a0-321-gf1c400731a (34) 23:47:28 Monster database of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.29-a0-286-g41199d4a87