00:34:50 <Discord|> <08w​ormsofcan> oh, is that the reason there was a player earlier that had 5* piety with max curses?
00:44:12 <Discord|> <05k​ate> could well be yeah, i can't grab the save but i added a comment to the github issue asking if they cursed things in the abyss
00:44:12 <Discord|> <05k​ate> it would explain it going back to full piety on them reloading the game too
00:45:42 <Gretell> Monster database of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.28-a0-1510-gd0f6b136d3
01:35:21 <Kelbell> Fork (bcrawl) on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.23-a0-4506-g453a05f5f4
02:17:42 -!- allbery_b is now known as geekosaur
04:23:18 <Lantell> Experimental (bcrawl) branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.23-a0-4506-g453a05f5f4
08:06:34 <perryprog> not to be impatient, but it'd be a bit nice to get this feat merged before the freeze. Ever since configuring my autopickup to not grab certain rings depending on my class, the bug this fixes has been really bothering me. https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2310
08:07:35 <perryprog> Specifically I have stuff like magic-based rings marked as autopickup exceptions, but as-is this is ignored
09:21:20 <NotCheibriados> 03Kiëd Llaentenn02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2356 * 0.28-a0-1506-ga65ea37: fix: shorten and simplify orb flavor descriptions 10(3 minutes ago, 1 file, 10+ 20-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/a65ea37dae7e
10:44:46 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> cool trivia: we still have item menu code to support throwable weapons (daggers, spears, etc)
11:34:36 <advil> lol, blink_brightens_background works on putty
11:36:04 <advil> and here I was thinking that option was irrelevant in the modern age
11:36:18 <advil> it does mean that there's a way to get almost 16,16 colours in putty without players messing with TERM though (I say almost because something odd is going on with darkgrey background via blink with a white foreground)
11:38:14 <advil> also G-Flex_ It's possible that you didn't get darkgrey working yet, because it's much darker in my putty testing than in your screenshot
11:38:34 <G-Flex_> advil: I changed the color value I mentioned and the change definitely took effect
11:38:40 <advil> ah ok
11:38:44 <G-Flex_> I am curious why the "wandering" background turned bold/bright yellow
11:38:55 <advil> huh, I wasn't aware of that
11:38:56 <G-Flex_> before I changed term type it was the uh, darker/paler color, the browner one?
11:39:02 <G-Flex_> and now it's eye-searing
11:39:12 <advil> it shouldn't, can you give me a screenshot?
11:39:13 <G-Flex_> btw it turns out I lightened dark grey to begin with because it's used for text in a lot of menus
11:39:30 <G-Flex_> sure, one minute
11:39:39 <G-Flex_> my rcfile is ancient so god only knows what I've done wrong in it
11:39:48 <advil> I think on the default coloring darkgrey should only be used for unusable items in menus?
11:41:00 <G-Flex_> https://www.dreamsleeve.org/img/crawl-bright-yellow.png
11:42:29 <G-Flex_> I could also check my putty settings in case I goofed those up
11:42:29 <G-Flex_> I have "Allow terminal to specify ANSI colours", "Allow terminal to use xterm 256-colour mode", and "Allow terminal to use 24-bit colours" all checked
11:42:34 <G-Flex_> and Terminal-type string is putty-256color
11:45:13 <advil> yeah, I can confirm that's what's happening by default for monsters that are normally white fg
11:45:26 <advil> and white on putty's yellow is particularly bad
11:45:39 <G-Flex_> yeah white on pure yellow is awful
11:45:45 <G-Flex_> I'm not sure why it wasn't doing this before I changed terminal type though
11:45:58 <G-Flex_> maybe it wasn't bolding background colors? but why you'd bold a bg color to begin with I don't know.
11:46:23 <advil> G-Flex_: yes, you were only getting 8 bg colors before
11:46:43 <advil> it's kind of bad on other terminals too, it's just I guess people who have had 16 colors on for a while (e.g. me) got used to it
11:46:52 <G-Flex_> I feel like you'd want the bg to be non-bold if the fg is bold
11:47:04 <advil> but maybe the fg color should be `brown` and not `yellow`
11:47:12 <advil> for wandering monsters
11:47:18 <G-Flex_> you mean bg?
11:47:22 <advil> yeah, sorry
11:48:55 <G-Flex_> yeah I always assumed that was what it was supposed to be, and rarely had issues with it
11:48:55 <perryprog> dumb question: is there really a reason to support putty's crappy default TERM setting and not just say "set your TERM to something sane to play crawl on console putty"?
11:48:55 <advil> well we are kind of saying that
11:48:55 <perryprog> heck, my /calculator/ has more colors than putty's default $TERM definition does
11:48:55 <G-Flex_> I forget what it was set to before but it wasn't this, lol
11:48:56 <advil> it was set to yellow, but in 8 color mode, yellow bg renders the same as brown
11:49:09 <G-Flex_> I mean my term string
11:49:20 <advil> ah, `xterm` is the default for putty, I was able to confirm that
11:49:26 <G-Flex_> yeah I think it was that
11:49:50 <advil> perryprog: but I think it's also good to give people some help given that putty is so common (adjusting for base rate)
11:49:56 <perryprog> Fair
11:50:20 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> @hellmonk probably a dumb question: is it still important for red devils to have polearms as their "signature weapon", meaning they'll never swap to a non-polearm?
11:50:34 <perryprog> You could also probably display a warning on startup if putty + TERM=xterm (someone tell through environment variables I guess? I don't have Windows)
11:50:50 <perryprog> s/someone/somehow
11:51:01 <advil> I'm working on a diagnostic popup for this stuff that'll have something like that
11:51:08 <perryprog> Nice
11:51:42 <Discord|> <06a​dvil>         // hint for the putty users:         if (info.term == "xterm")             s += "For 16 colours, try setting a better TERM value than `xterm`, e.g. `xterm-256color` (most terminals) or `putty-256color` (for PuTTY).\n";
11:52:13 <perryprog> It's good you're writing that because I would have said "a normal TERM value" (/s)
11:57:24 <spicyCebolla> such magnanimity
11:57:30 <spicyCebolla> what service!
12:24:42 <Discord|> <09h​ellmonk> seems to make their use of barbs af more distinct, but probably not
13:04:25 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> also, nice av
13:31:30 <NotCheibriados> New branch created: pull/2360 (1 commit) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2360
13:31:31 <NotCheibriados> 03Diego Essaya02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2360 * 0.28-a0-1511-g8589bf8: fix: click + key modifier detection in tiles 10(7 minutes ago, 3 files, 5+ 24-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/8589bf88f321
13:51:53 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> hm, trying to figure out what the right ui for ranged weapons is once they no longer use ammo. Currently considering two options: (1) In the quiver code, create a virtual ammo object and (f)ire that as at present. Feels quite bad from a code perspective. (2) Use the same (v) code as is used by polearms and other weapons to fire launchers. Quite straightforward, but it's rather surprising for existing players that (f) would no
13:51:53 <Discord|> longer (f)ire a bow or sling.
13:52:25 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> could also swap bindings around, but that feels like an even bigger mess
13:54:57 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> (3) have (f) follow a completely independent codepath (that is, firing rather than using the quiver) if you're wielding a ranged weapon
13:55:05 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> and maybe have an option to enable that behaviour, off by default?
13:55:29 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> think i'll probably do that for now
14:06:01 <Discord|> <05k​ate> how would launchers work in this implementation? i feel like using the quiver is best since that's kind of what it's there for, i guess it depends to some extent on whether you still have to wield them or not maybe
14:06:39 <perryprog> apropros quiver: some more functionality for quick-switching what you have quivered (besides just ]) might be nice
14:08:17 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> i'm confused; 'how launchers work' is what i was describing
14:08:33 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> the option i'm leaning toward, (2), would make launchers fire when you press (v)
14:08:58 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> (the wielded launcher, that is - you still have to wield them)
14:09:16 <Discord|> <05k​ate> that's what i wasn't sure about yeah, whether they'd be like wands or like polearms
14:09:18 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> right
14:10:43 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> my feeling is that they'd still suck, but that it'd be a step toward removal
14:10:43 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> and probably a somewhat better experience in the meanwhile
14:11:21 <Discord|> <05k​ate> hmm, i guess i don't know if "brokenly overpowered" is better than "brokenly overpowered but people don't use them because the interface is bad", i feel like skipping the step and going straight to removal might still be safer
14:12:30 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> my plan was to increase delay some
14:13:02 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> think it's very possible to make them not brokenly overpowered if the numbers line up right
14:13:57 <Discord|> <05k​ate> ah that sounds reasonable to try yeah, i'm definitely not opposed to trying to make them work better with a non-painful interface
14:17:10 <Discord|> <05k​ate> high delay could be a good place to start tuning since at least it means you're spending multiple turns on them for something with no other cost, compared to stuff with costs like wands/spells
14:17:10 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> happy to hear opinions on delay numbers; i hadn't settled on anything concrete
14:17:10 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> i think in the long run launchers probably still go but i think full removal sparks little joy in players. and i do like sparking joy from time to time
14:17:45 <Discord|> <05k​ate> wonder if abstracting away the wield requirement and having them just be quivered items but then bumping the delay up even further would help too. i feel like part of the problem is pretty much everything that improves the interface also makes them even more clearly just "free full-LOS damage", though
14:18:15 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> i don't really want every player to have free infinite access to full LOS damage
14:18:42 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> right now you can toss some rocks, or you can use some limited supply evocables/throwables (which we've been paring down aggressively)
14:18:53 <Discord|> <05k​ate> right, but the problem is they sort of currently do (and would do with a wield requirement too, it's just fiddlier)
14:19:10 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> mm
14:19:20 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> unless you're with ash, or have a contam weapon, etc 😛
14:19:22 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> but yeah
14:20:41 <Discord|> <12e​bering> I've been mulling range-scaling w/skill
14:20:49 <Discord|> <12e​bering> so that a 0 skill launcher is no better than a pole arm
14:20:59 <Discord|> <12e​bering> combined with the wield requirement that makes it not worth it
14:21:11 <Discord|> <12e​bering> (feeling a bit more able to think today)
14:23:33 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> oh good! prayin with u
14:23:33 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> range scaling with skill is very cute
14:23:33 <Discord|> <12e​bering> wasn't blinkitis an old badmut
14:23:52 <Discord|> <05k​ate> i don't think so, it used to just be a good mut for innate blink ability
14:24:09 <Discord|> <05k​ate> and wispform had blinkitis, which was absolutely awful
14:24:25 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> there was the red imp experimental species
14:24:31 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> but maybe that just had teleportitis too
14:24:31 <geekosaur> you're thinking of teleportitis I think??
14:24:57 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> to be clear, we're responding to https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2361, which just got posted in the discord by the git webhook
14:26:55 <geekosaur> huh. have to admit I've never thought that much about teleportitis when I've had it. removed it usually when I had a chance, but it was an annoyance rather than a problem 90% of the time
14:28:14 <Discord|> <05k​ate> i don't think it particularly falls into the category of "run-ending mutations" (on top of that category not existing and the claimed problem not being a problem in the first place), yeah
14:28:29 <Discord|> <12e​bering> "no counterplay" is a design shibbolith for a group of players whose analysis refuses to consider preparation counterplay
14:29:31 <NotCheibriados> New branch created: pull/2361 (5 commits) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2361
14:29:33 <NotCheibriados> 03Oneirical02 {GitHub} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2361 * 0.28-a0-1511-ga0c3382: feat: replace MUT_TELEPORT with MUT_BLINKITIS 10(56 minutes ago, 1 file, 1+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/a0c338215eec
14:29:33 <NotCheibriados> 03Oneirical02 {GitHub} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2361 * 0.28-a0-1512-gbeeb507: feat: ban Blinkitis for treeform/formicids, allow in Sprint 10(55 minutes ago, 1 file, 2+ 6-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/beeb5074c78e
14:29:33 <NotCheibriados> 03Oneirical02 {GitHub} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2361 * 0.28-a0-1513-gbc2ab87: feat: archive MUT_TELEPORT, add flavour messages 10(45 minutes ago, 1 file, 18+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/bc2ab8700efa
14:29:33 <NotCheibriados> 03Oneirical02 {GitHub} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2361 * 0.28-a0-1514-gfba1a1c: feat: remove random teleport from MUT_TELEPORT 10(43 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/fba1a1cae89d
14:29:33 <NotCheibriados> 03Oneirical02 {GitHub} 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2361 * 0.28-a0-1515-g215ac31: feat: implement Blinkitis with the same logic as Deterioration 10(24 minutes ago, 1 file, 10+ 0-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/215ac310fe79
14:30:02 <Discord|> <12e​bering> e.g. "paralysis is bad because it has no counterplay"
14:30:02 <Discord|> <12e​bering> in contrast to "paralysis is good because the only possible counterplay is before it takes effect"
14:30:02 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> shibboleth is a great word that i should use more often
14:30:02 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> it's a shibboleth for people who like biblical references
14:30:21 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> imo frail is a run-ending mutation (because it may cause you to run out of hp)
14:30:54 * perryprog was about to mention that I felt like *Slow was triggering less than it should before realizing I've been playing Fo
14:30:55 <geekosaur> frai doesn't bother me much either.but then I usually play ^hep
14:31:12 <geekosaur> *frail
14:31:18 <perryprog> Eh, the armor -ac one is pretty rough
14:31:48 <perryprog> but I've never had a mutation that by itself (except maybe "armor fits weirdly") that would make me want to try to quaff it away
14:34:15 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> ooh, nice abyss fixes!
14:34:16 <Discord|> <05k​ate> can anyone with cue save file access take a look at https://github.com/crawl/crawl/issues/2358 ? pretty sure that commit fixes it and !lm suggests they were in the abyss recently, just need to see if that's when they cursed their gear
14:34:43 <Discord|> <05k​ate> and yeah, i really hope nobody sacrificed a hand to ru in the abyss recently
14:34:58 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> kate, did you see the skeral thing?
14:34:59 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/747522859361894521/932025091708051516/unknown.png
14:35:02 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> it's very funny to me
14:35:14 <NotCheibriados> 03kate-02 07* 0.28-a0-1511-g0647d93: Refactor piety gain prevention in the Abyss 10(40 minutes ago, 7 files, 76+ 59-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/0647d9364eca
14:36:28 <Discord|> <05k​ate> nice, comparable to my pro strat of dueling monsters in the abyss to get xp from them
14:36:28 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> (this seems enormously impractical but definitely funny)
14:39:29 <Discord|> <05k​ate> and yeah, seems doubtful that you'd gain more than you lose by kiting stuff to an exit repeatedly
14:39:36 <Discord|> <09h​ellmonk> Less pudding farming and more pudding intensive horticulture
14:40:27 <perryprog> pudding farming is a skill based mechanic
14:40:53 <perryprog> I do think it was funny that one response by the NH dev team to why pudding farming wasn't a big deal was because the punishment was... having to do pudding farming.
14:41:11 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> it was a very cute answer
14:41:12 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> wrong, but cute
14:41:15 <perryprog> Yeah
14:41:20 <Discord|> <05k​ate> it gets quoted a lot and it's a good comparison of design philosophies, yeah
14:42:54 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> of course, modern nethack removed pudding farming anyway
14:45:43 <Discord|> <12e​bering> someone in a recent abyss thread tried to ascribe the quote to us
14:46:00 <Discord|> <12e​bering> > What's the line - "The punishment for grinding the Abyss is grinding the Abyss"?
14:49:48 <perryprog> Apropos nothing: am I correct in saying that a melee Usk player has essentially no reason to use a weapon besides axes?
14:50:12 <perryprog> !source did_hurt_conduct
14:50:12 <Sequell> 1/1. https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/source/god-conduct.cc#L1129
14:50:32 <Discord|> <12e​bering> no?
14:50:39 <perryprog> Despite there being oops, wrong function
14:50:54 <perryprog> !source _handle_uskayaw_piety
14:50:54 <Sequell> 1/1. https://github.com/crawl/crawl/blob/master/crawl-ref/source/player-reacts.cc#L358
14:51:37 <perryprog> Despite there being the max(num_hurt, [...]), I have never found it feasible for even skilled long blade users to be able to outpace piety gain of axes
14:54:07 <Discord|> <12e​bering> loot (esp before joining a god), species apts, and desire to take advantage of stabbing opportunities afforded by usk all influence the decision
14:56:11 <perryprog> My concern is that cleaving gives significantly faster piety gain than high single-target damage
14:56:15 <perryprog> I'm not sure if I'm correct, though
14:59:09 <Discord|> <12e​bering> well, if you cleave 8 targets you get 8 for num hurt
14:59:28 <Discord|> <12e​bering> and the hurt value is the total damage done
15:00:00 <perryprog> Gah
15:00:16 <perryprog> Yeah so I'm totally wrong, then. Sorry.
15:00:17 <Discord|> <12e​bering> so the max is usually going to be selecting the damage, even with the stepdown
15:00:29 <perryprog> Right
15:02:04 <perryprog> Or wait, if the hurt value is total damage done, that means it's still affected by cleaving
15:02:04 <Kelbell> Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.28-a0-1511-g0647d9364e (34)
15:02:04 <perryprog> Since the total damage that an ideal cleaving will do (and I suspect even a cleave on two opponents versus a single-target attack with another weapon against one) might be higher
15:02:04 <Discord|> <12e​bering> yes
15:02:18 <perryprog> So that means ultimately axes will (not including one-on-one situations) give higher piety gain?
15:02:39 <Discord|> <12e​bering> I'm not sure what you're getting at
15:02:45 <perryprog> That feels weird to me.
15:03:17 <Discord|> <12e​bering> why?
15:03:28 <perryprog> I would expect as a player that I could do "generally" as well with Usk with any weapon, regardless of its special abilities
15:03:51 <Discord|> <12e​bering> I'm really having hard time understanding what you're getting at?
15:03:57 <Discord|> <12e​bering> Usk's conduct is: you gain piety for doin damage
15:03:57 <perryprog> Instead, it seems like if you're playing Usk that it rarely makes sense to use anything but axes
15:04:03 <Discord|> <12e​bering> axes cleave means more damage
15:04:11 <Discord|> <12e​bering> BUT
15:04:19 <Discord|> <12e​bering> if you can melee a monster it can melee you back
15:04:46 <perryprog> hm true
15:12:50 <perryprog> Also: should Usk's prepare audience really have a chance to trigger as close together as what looks like 300 auts? That seems a bit extreme. I also think I'm misunderstanding what causes prepare audience to actually trigger. _Uskayaw prepares the audience for your solo! / [...]/ _Duvessa is heavily wounded. / [...] _Duvessa is no longer paralysed. / [...] /  _Uskayaw prepares the audience for your solo!
15:14:59 <perryprog> I've been playing Usk characters almost exclusively for over the last week and I /still/ feel confused when I have prepare audience trigger twice in succession—hence why I'm bringing it up
15:22:13 <perryprog> Oh, it is me misunderstanding what causes it to trigger—it's random chance based on how long it's been since it's last been triggered
15:22:20 <perryprog> I thought it was a timer with a random length.
15:22:32 * perryprog should stick to bugfixes
15:44:04 <Discord|> <05k​ate> it was very funny that the scary message of "really attempt to enter this malign gateway? there's no telling what horrifying things it will do to you!!!" was then followed by "you take 2 damage and blink", rip to that
15:45:58 <NotCheibriados> 03kate-02 07* 0.28-a0-1512-g142ac7c: Don't use Malign Gateways as walls for Creeping Frost (#2359) 10(17 minutes ago, 1 file, 11+ 4-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/142ac7cd7379
15:45:58 <NotCheibriados> 03kate-02 07* 0.28-a0-1513-ge4f4046: Don't allow attempting to enter Malign Gateway portals 10(12 minutes ago, 2 files, 2+ 39-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/e4f40463031f
15:48:25 <Kelbell> Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.28-a0-1513-ge4f4046303 (34)
16:14:26 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> @kate ty for fixing the creeping frost thing! you keep implementing all my TODO fixes before i get to them... at this rate i'll have none left!
16:16:48 <Discord|> <05k​ate> ah heh, np, i was just scanning github issues looking for low-hanging fruit
16:21:26 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> i should look at gh issues someday
16:21:36 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> i just see these things coming in on discord
16:21:41 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> happy that people are reporting em! we've trained em well
16:23:33 <Lantell> Unstable branch on underhound.eu updated to: 0.28-a0-1513-ge4f4046303 (34)
17:38:58 <advil> does anyone know how TERM gets determined for webtiles underlying terminals
18:40:10 <NotCheibriados> New branch created: pull/2364 (2 commits) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2364
18:40:10 <NotCheibriados> 03Aliscans02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2364 * 0.28-a0-1514-ge1ae3c4: Create an option to control how a highlighted menu row is shown. 10(3 minutes ago, 4 files, 74+ 7-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/e1ae3c469357
18:40:10 <NotCheibriados> 03Aliscans02 07https://github.com/crawl/crawl/pull/2364 * 0.28-a0-1515-g9df3884: Make space toggle the selected item in shop menus. 10(3 minutes ago, 1 file, 0+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/9df38846b879
19:56:29 <NotCheibriados> 03advil02 07* 0.28-a0-1514-g3e5f175: feat: support background colors in formatted_string 10(70 minutes ago, 6 files, 180+ 68-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/3e5f17529fdd
19:56:29 <NotCheibriados> 03advil02 07* 0.28-a0-1515-g81556d0: feat: color/display diagnostic popup 10(43 minutes ago, 6 files, 186+ 3-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/81556d0073cd
19:56:29 <NotCheibriados> 03advil02 07* 0.28-a0-1516-g37088b3: fix: tweak hover color for 8 color consoles 10(4 minutes ago, 1 file, 5+ 1-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/37088b3766e0
19:56:29 <NotCheibriados> 03advil02 07* 0.28-a0-1517-g020f416: fix: revert main menu hover changes 10(3 minutes ago, 3 files, 9+ 5-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/020f4162166a
20:01:02 <Discord|> <10P​leasingFungus> incredible advil power
20:05:25 <spicyCebolla> he's committing like a wrecking ball
20:07:37 <advil> I could not for the life of me figure out where the background color for monster awareness state is set or configured
20:07:58 <advil> does anyone know?
20:08:59 <Discord|> <12e​bering> iirc it goes by brand in the code
20:09:01 <Discord|> <12e​bering> sleep_brand
20:11:53 <advil> thanks, turns out to be `may_stab_brand`
20:12:01 <advil> that name could maybe use some work
20:12:58 <advil> and I wasn't finding the code because it's incredibly low level
20:13:47 <advil> and stored in a really odd way
20:14:31 <Discord|> <12e​bering> yeah, I remember doing this hunt once
20:22:02 <NotCheibriados> 03advil02 07* 0.28-a0-1518-gbe868bc: fix: tone down default `may_stab_brand` (G-flex) 10(5 minutes ago, 2 files, 2+ 2-) 13https://github.com/crawl/crawl/commit/be868bca14da
20:23:17 <Kelbell> Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.28-a0-1517-g020f416216 (34)
20:32:35 <Kelbell> Unstable branch on crawl.kelbi.org updated to: 0.28-a0-1518-gbe868bca14 (34)
21:20:46 <G-Flex_> Thanks for the quick response on that
23:35:17 <Gretell> Unstable branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.28-a0-1518-gbe868bca14 (34)
23:56:29 <Gretell> Windows builds of master branch on crawl.develz.org updated to: 0.28-a0-1518-gbe868bca14